Spark Your Career: Ace the 2025 Apache Spark Certification Test with Flair!

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Question: 1 / 345

In terms of computation time, how does Spark's performance compare to that of Hadoop when both use memory?

Faster by a factor of 50

Faster by a factor of 100

Spark's ability to outperform Hadoop in terms of computation time, especially when utilizing in-memory processing, is a key feature that distinguishes it from the traditional Hadoop MapReduce framework. When processing data, Spark leverages memory for storage, which significantly reduces the need to read from and write to disk repeatedly. This optimization allows Spark to perform computations much more quickly than Hadoop, particularly for iterative algorithms and real-time data processing tasks.

The claim that Spark can be "faster by a factor of 100" reflects findings from various benchmarks and real-world experiences showing that Spark's in-memory capabilities lead to substantial performance improvements. In practice, this noted enhancement is due to the elimination of the latency associated with disk I/O, allowing Spark to execute operations sequentially without the delays imposed by having to access persistent storage. As a result, computations that may take significantly longer in Hadoop can be accomplished in a fraction of the time with Spark.

Choosing this factor emphasizes the inherent efficiency of Spark's architecture, particularly in applications that benefit from in-memory computation, and aligns with the expectations for performance improvements found in the data processing community.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Faster by a factor of 200

Faster by a factor of 300

Next

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy